How are articles about research findings shared?

Sharing articles about research findings happens in two stages: first, through formal publication—and then, through the systems that make published work discoverable, accessible, and usable by others.

From Published to Discoverable

Even the most groundbreaking article can’t make an impact if it’s hard to find, understand, or trust. Behind the scenes, publishers structure articles to be usable by both people and machines—through rich metadata, standardized licensing, and coordination with discovery services across the globe.

These efforts ensure that published work is visible in search engines, linked across databases, and citable with confidence.

What Makes Research Findable—and Keepable

Getting reports about research findings out into the world doesn’t stop at publication. To be found, understood, and reused, they must be integrated into the digital research ecosystem. That means structuring them for search, ensuring they are properly indexed, and preserved for the long haul. Here’s how publishers support the systems that make articles about research findings discoverable today—and accessible tomorrow.

Every published article is enriched with structured metadata—titles, abstracts, keywords, author affiliations, funder information, persistent identifiers like DOIs (Digital Object Identifiers), and more. Metadata isn’t just administrative: it’s what allows content to be found in databases, tracked in citation indexes, and measured in impact assessments.

Without robust metadata, an article is effectively invisible to the systems researchers rely on to discover, assess, and reuse content. Publishers apply standards like JATS XML and Crossref metadata deposits to ensure articles connect seamlessly across platforms.

Explore more:

Scholars don’t find articles about research findings by chance. Publishers ensure their content is indexed in major discovery platforms like PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. They also optimize metadata for machine readability, enable linked references through Crossref, and build tools for full-text search, content alerts, and thematic browsing.

These efforts support interdisciplinary access, help researchers identify connections, and enable transparency in how articles about research findings are cited, reused, and built upon. It’s an ecosystem of coordination that benefits the entire research community.

Explore more:

Preserving published articles about research findings is about more than keeping a digital copy—it’s about ensuring future access, long after platforms evolve or links break. Publishers partner with long-term preservation services like CLOCKSS and Portico to deposit content in secure, decentralized archives.

These services are designed to protect against loss, support digital continuity, and guarantee scholarly permanence. Combined with internal publisher archives and redundancy protocols, these measures safeguard the enduring availability of the scholarly record.

Explore more:

Making articles about research findings discoverable is only part of the story. Once someone finds it—what can they do with it? That’s where licensing comes in.

The Terms That Enable Sharing

Once a published article is out in the world, licensing decides how it can be used. Who can read it, reuse it, remix it? These terms aren’t just legal formalities—they shape how knowledge flows.

What is licensing, really?

Every published article comes with a license—an agreement that spells out what others can do with the work. Can it be shared? Adapted? Used commercially? For publishers, licensing balances three priorities: openness, credit, and protection.

No one-size-fits-all.

There’s no universal license that fits every purpose. Some licenses maximize reuse (like Creative Commons); others restrict commercial applications or require attribution. Terms often depend on the field, the funder, and the publication model—whether subscription, hybrid, or Open Access.

Open Access ≠ single model.

While many OA journals use Creative Commons licenses (e.g., CC BY), others adopt custom terms to fit legal, cultural, or institutional needs. Licensing frameworks vary—especially across countries with different copyright regimes.

The takeaway:

Licenses aren’t fine print—they’re the tools that make articles about research findings reusable, buildable, and legally safe to share. Understanding them is key to responsible, equitable knowledge exchange.

What Licensing Actually Looks Like

—
Creative Commons (e.g., CC BY, CC BY-NC): Commonly used in open access, these licenses communicate how work can be reused.

—
Publisher-Specific or National Licenses: Some publishers or governments have developed their own licensing models tailored to legal or policy contexts.

—
Custom Agreements: In some cases, authors and publishers negotiate custom terms, especially for content that requires special considerations (e.g., sensitive data or images).


A Quick Guide to Author Rights in Scholarly Publishing

When authors publish their work, they often sign an agreement with a journal or publisher that spells out who holds the copyright and what rights the author retains. These agreements vary—and they can affect how, where, and when you’re able to share your own article.

This short explainer outlines the most common approaches to author rights in scholarly publishing. It helps make sense of copyright transfer, licensing options, and what to look for in publishing agreements—so you can make informed decisions that support both your research goals and access to your work.

Download the Guide →

Licensing frameworks govern how published articles are reused—but what about the data behind them? And how is access to content managed at scale? Let’s look at two critical pieces of the open research puzzle: open data and open access.

What is Open Data?

In scholarly research, open data refers to the practice of making research data freely accessible, usable, and shareable by others—accompanied by clear documentation and proper licensing. It’s grounded in the idea that transparency and reproducibility are foundational to progress: that others should be able to inspect, validate, reuse, and build upon the underlying evidence behind published findings.

Open data isn’t a one-size-fits-all mandate. Policies vary across disciplines, funders, and publishers, and implementation depends on practical considerations like privacy, intellectual property, and infrastructure. But at its core, the principle remains the same: making research data more open.


A shared set of actions for making research data more open and useful.
The STM–DataCite–Crossref Joint Statement outlines 12 practical, community-driven best practices to support responsible research data sharing across the scholarly ecosystem.

Explore the 12 Best Practices →

 

IOP Publishing: “Open Data: A Practical Primer”, an on-demand workshop
This introductory guide to open data principles and practices is a resource designed to help researchers understand the importance of data sharing and how to implement it effectively in their work.

Open Access Models

Several models are in use across the research ecosystem, reflecting a mix of funder requirements, institutional preferences, disciplinary norms, and regional priorities. These models differ in how costs are covered, how content is made available, and the terms of reuse.

Gold OA is currently the most widely adopted model and is often seen as the most scalable. Its growth has been driven by its ability to support the infrastructure and services needed to sustain high-quality, trusted scholarly communication. Other models, including Green and Diamond OA, also contribute to the broader open research landscape—each offering distinct advantages and challenges.

Explore the STM OA Dashboard—a comprehensive tool tracking the global growth of open access publishing.

Gold represents those publications where the final published version of an article (Version of Record) is freely and permanently available online immediately on publication for anyone, anywhere to read. This includes articles in hybrid journals.  Access is often funded through Article Publishing Charges (APCs), which may be paid by authors, their institutions, or funders.

Green represents those publications where a version of an article is publicly shared online, often as an Accepted Manuscript.  To support a sustainable business model, publishers may maintain an embargo and/or may retain an Exclusive License to Publish.

Articles are free to read and free to publish. Instead of charging authors or readers, these journals are typically supported by universities, scholarly societies, or public funding. Diamond OA removes financial barriers on both sides—supporting greater equity in who can share and access research. However, because this model relies on external funding or institutional support, questions remain about its long-term scalability and sustainability at larger volumes.

Bronze represents those publications that are made free-to-read on the publisher’s website, but are not identified as gold for one of the following reasons: access for a limited duration, an unclear license, or a license that is clear.

Contracts between publishers and institutions or library consortia that shift subscription spending to support open access publishing. These agreements often include read-and-publish or publish-and-read components, enabling more articles about research findings to be published OA while maintaining access to subscription content during the transition.

In 2023, 38% of all global journal articles, reviews and conference papers were published as immediately available, freely accessible, Version of Record via gold OA.

—STM OA Dashboard

Together, these elements—discovery infrastructure, licensing, open data, and OA models—form the backbone of how research moves through the world.