Nature survey on #genAI — and how STM’s draft AI classification can help

A new Nature Magazine survey of 5,000+ researchers shows there’s no clear consensus on how and when generative AI should be used in writing and reviewing scholarly papers — or how that use should be disclosed.

To help bring clarity, STM has released a draft report: Classifying AI Use in Manuscript Preparation — that offers a clear framework to help publishers define, evaluate, and guide the transparent use of AI in manuscript preparation.

As STM Solution’s Program Director Joris van Rossum notes in the article: “We hope that publishers — and the wider ecosystem — will adopt the terminology.”

Read the full Nature article here.